Dangerous hairdryer – your rights

Lucy contacted me this week about a claim she is trying to bring against a producer of a product. Last May Lucy purchased a hair dryer from a television shopping channel. On the first use of the hairdryer her hair got sucked into the back of the hairdryer and tangled around the motor inside. What she describes as a “huge clump” of her hair then got ripped from her scalp. She also had to cut another large chunk of her hair as she could not untangle this from inside the motor.

Lucy was left with large chunks of her missing, a severely scared scalp and mental scars from the incident. She contacted the producer of the hair dryer, sending pictures of her head. They then organised to retrieve the hair dryer for an inspection. Four months later they wrote back to her saying that they found no fault with the hairdryer so they were closing the complaint.  Lucy did not accept this so wrote them a further letter threatening legal proceedings. This letter was ignored. She then wrote again in December and again threatened legal proceedings. She then again chased then in February and finally she received a response on 13th  March 2018. This response was not from the producer but from their lawyers. They said that any claim Lucy attempted to bring would be hopeless as the hairdryer was not defective when their client supplied it and this is an absolute defence under the Consumer Protection Act.

Lucy’s case is that there is not a sufficient guard at the back of the hairdryer to stop hair tangling around the motor. If this is correct, she will definitely have a case. Her key rights are therefore as follows:


The law

Section 2(1) of the Consumer Protection Act provides that anyone who suffers damage as a result of the defect of a product, is entitled to claim damages, so long as the damage was caused wholly or partly by the defect.

Timing of your claim

Claims under the Consumer Protection Act must be commenced within three years from the date you become aware of the damage. You must also bring the claim within ten years after the product was last put into circulation.


If the producer can prove that the product was not faulty when they sold it this will be ab absolute defence to a claim

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s